“History Syllabi” by Walter Lynwood Fleming
The History Teacher’s Magazine 1.1, December, 1909
A well-constructed syllabus is a useful aid to the instructor and to the student of history in high school and sometimes in college classes. A good syllabus usually contains not only an outline of the essential topics in orderly sequence with numbered divisions and indentations to indicate the value of the topics and their relation one to another, but also definite and more or less complete references to the best reading on each important subject. A complete syllabus should contain also lists of additional topics for extra work or for advanced students, with suitable references to the proper reading necessary to develop this extra work. In syllabi designed for use in high schools and the lower classes of college, references to good historical maps and atlases are usually found, as well as suggestions for map work, lists of historical pictures and other illustrative material, suggestions to teachers and to students, and “thought questions” or “problems.”
Among the published syllabi designed for high school work are the following: “A History Syllabus for Secondary Schools” (New England History Teachers’ Association, published by D. C. Heath, 1904), arranged in four divisions—ancient history, medieval and modern history, England, and the United States—with full reference lists and estimates of the percentage value of each section of the course; “The History and Social Science Syllabus” of the New York State Education Department, a slight modification of the New England syllabus that omits the bibliographies; Leadbetter, “Outlines and Studies of Ancient, Medieval and Modern History” (Ginn & Co.), based on the texts of Myers, with good outlines, a few well-selected references, and very good “studies” or “thought questions.” Several publishers of history texts have issued outlines or manuals to accompany them. The best of these for school use are the “Teaching of American History,” etc., published by Appleton to accompany the Twentieth Century texts. The New York State Education Department has prepared numbers of outlines on special fields of history, all of which are helpful to teachers and some of which can be used to advantage with high school and college classes. Nearly all the history syllabi for schools follow the division of the subject into periods recommended by the Committee of Seven.
Several published outlines for use in college classes are worthy of note. Among them are: Shepherd’s “Syllabus of the Epochs of History,” used in the first year work at Columbia University; the two outlines used for the same purpose at Dartmouth College; Munro and Sellery’s “Syllabus of Medieval History,” and Ames’s “American Colonial History” (University of Pennsylvania); Sheldon’s “Teachers’ Manuals” (Heath); the Columbia University (New York) Extension Syllabi, especially those prepared by Professors Shepherd, Shotwell and Beard; and the University of Chicago Extension Syllabi, which are very useful for short periods. All of these outlines can be procured through the book dealers, while many others privately printed can also be obtained. For nearly every competent instructor in history in the colleges and universities has found that in some part of his work there is no proper guide, and to supply the lack has constructed a syllabus.
The general use in high schools of good syllabi such as the New York or the New England outlines with their useful suggestions as to essentials, proportions and methods tends to raise standards, to make uniform the quantity and quality of history work, and to cause the adoption of good methods of teaching.
The advocates of the syllabus have much more than this to say in favor of its use. They claim that it is a guide to study, to the use of a text, to the use of reference works, to the proper division of a subject; that it is a good basis for class discussion, recitation, and examination; and that it keeps topical work from producing confused results, etc. Whether the syllabus will do all this is doubtful, but that it is a valuable aid is certain. When no satisfactory text can be had, the only thing that an instructor can do—formal lectures to immature students being out of the question—is to construct a syllabus or to procure a good one made by some one else. This outline is necessary to give proportion, connection and organization to the course. By making his own syllabus an instructor can secure proper attention to the points that he thinks should be emphasized, and he has in his outline a definite plan of the work to be done, something that many of the texts do not offer.
With the syllabus constantly before him the student will see the subject in its proper proportions; he will not get lost in the mass of detail which must cumber even the best books, but with this guide to the essentials he will be able to collect information from his readings, from explanatory lectures, etc., and to organize it about the framework of the syllabus. Knowing what he is looking for, having a more definite aim than one working out an assignment of “the next fifteen pages,” he can get more satisfactory results.
Not only is it worth while to a young student to have the main topics logically arranged, and ordered in their proper relations, but the practice in the collection and organization of information gained from different authorities will tend to foster the habit of comparison, will cultivate the judgment even though slightly, and will assist the development of the critical faculty. The old system of using one text with “by heart” recitations, though it gave accurate information, did not do this.
With high school and elementary college classes the syllabus should be used in close connection with a text or texts, reference being made to other authorities for differing views, additional information, or wholly new material. No ordinary manuals cover all the parts of a field that a teacher believes should be treated; while the syllabus based on several texts, outlines a more comprehensive plan than any one text has ever done. The proportion observed in the syllabus may correct the text that is too diffuse, too overloaded with details, or too condensed.
For classes pursuing the study of history by the topical method a syllabus is a good thing to bind the work together, to give it connection and definite form. The syllabus is something more than a mere list of subjects; it aims to show relations, to bridge the space between one large topic and another. Too many topics should not be suggested by the syllabus; the fewer and larger the topics the freer the student is to arrange his information about each topic; while too minute analysis makes the work tedious and keeps a student from exercising originality in the arrangement of his material.
In my work in school and college I have found the syllabus useful not only with classes using texts, but with more advanced classes having no prescribed texts. I prefer to make the outlines myself, but find that the published syllabi give valuable hints. In assigning class work, a certain number of topics are given to the class as a lesson. Each individual is required to work out a single topic for extra work. The students read the text and the recommended reference books on each topic, gather the information in note-books, and then are ready for recitation, discussion, or report in class. At least once a month I give to my classes a list of “problems” or “studies” similar to those found in Leadbetter’s “Outlines” and Botsford’s “Greece” and “Rome.” The working out of these aids causes the student to assimilate the information that he has gained and to see the subject in its different aspects; and also tends to prevent indifferent work with the syllabus.
A Tentative List
The following list of titles makes no pretense of being exhaustive. It was put together from the notes of several of the editors of the Magazine in order to furnish a timely supplement to the article by Prof. Fleming.
It is hoped to publish in the near future a more extended bibliography of those syllabi now in print and on sale for general use. Additions or corrections may be sent to the managing editor, or to Howard M. Stuckert, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Primarily for College Classes.
Alvord, C. W., and Paetow, L. J.—“Syllabus of Mediæval European History” (from the fourth to the sixteenth century). Champaign, Ill., D. H. Lloyd.
Ames, H. V.—“A Syllabus of American Political and Institutional History During the Colonial and Revolutionary Periods.” Philadelphia, Department of History, University of Pennsylvania, $1.
Burr, G. L.—“Outlines of Studies in the History of the Middle Ages, with Suggestions as to the Sources of Knowledge.” Ithaca, N. Y., Department of History, Cornell University.
Channing, E., and Hart, A. B.—“Guide to the Study of American History,” Boston, Ginn & Co.
Cubberley, E. P.—“Syllabus of Lectures on the History of Education,” with many reproductions of contemporary prints. New York, Macmillan Co.
Dow, E. W.—“Outlines and References for an Introductory Study of European History, from the Third to the Thirteenth Century.” Ann Arbor, George Wahr.
Fish, Carl.—“Syllabus for United States History.” Madison, Wis.
Foster, H. D., and Fay, S. B.—“Syllabus of Continental European History.” Hanover, N. H., Dartmouth College.
Hart, A. B.—“Handbook of the History, Diplomacy, and Government of the United States.” Cambridge, Mass.
Haskins, C. H.—“Topics and References for History, I (Middle Ages).” Cambridge, Harvard University.
Lingelbach, W. E.—“A Syllabus of the History of Europe in the Nineteenth Century.” Department of History, University of Pennsylvania, 60 cents.
Munro, D. C., and Sellery, G.—“Syllabus of Medieval History.” Department of History. University of Pennsylvania. $1.
Richardson, O. H., Ford, G. S., and Durfee, E. L.—“Syllabus of Continental European History from the Fall of Rome to 1870.” Boston, Ginn & Co.
Shepherd, W. R.—“Syllabus of the Epochs of History, with Reference to the Forms of Government and Changes in Social Conditions.” Department of History, Columbia University.
Smith, Don E.—“Syllabus on Historical Geography.” Berkeley, University of California.
Stephens, H. Morse.—“Syllabus of a Course of Lectures on Modern European History, 1600-1890.” New York, Macmillan Co.
Thompson, J. W.—“Reference Studies in Mediæval History (from the fourth to the sixteenth century).” Chicago, University of Chicago Press
Primarily for Secondary and Elementary Schools.
Allen, F. J.—“Topical Outline of English History.” Boston, D. C. Heath & Co. 25 cents.
Allen, W. F.—“History Topics for High Schools and Colleges.” Boston, D. C. Heath & Co. 25 cents.
Barnes, Mary S.—“Studies in American History: Teachers’ Manual.” Boston, D. C. Heath & Co.
Barnes, Mary S.—“Teachers’ Manual to General History.” Boston, D. C. Heath & Co. 85 cents.
Committee of Eight, The.—“The Study of History in the Elementary Schools.” New York, Scribners’. 50 cents.
Cornman, O. P., and Gerson, O.—“Topical Survey of United States History.” Boston, D. C. Heath & Co. 60 cents.
Dodge, S. S.—“Outlines of English History.” New York, A. S. Barnes & Co. 25 cents.
Ensign, S. Laura.—“Outlines of Ancient, Medieval and Modern History.” New York, A. S. Barnes & Co. 75 cents.
Ensign, S. Laura.—“Outline Tables and Sketches in United States History.” New York, A. S. Barnes & Co. 25 cents.
Fleming, Walter L.—“Syllabus of High School Course in History,” in “State Course of Study for High Schools of Louisiana.” Baton Rouge, La., Department of Education.
Heckel.—“Topics and References for Ancient History (based on Morey and West).” Indiana, Pa., State Normal School.
Gordy, W. F., and Twitchell, W. I.—“A Pathfinder in American History.” New York, Lee and Sheppard.
Kemp, E. W.—“An Outline of History for the Grades.” Boston, Ginn & Co.
Knowlton, D. C.—“Studies in English History Prepared for the Use of High Schools and Academies.” New York State Teacher, Ithaca, N. Y. 35 cents.
Leadbetter, Florence E.—“Outlines and Studies to Accompany Myers’ Ancient History, and Medieval and Modern History,” 2 volumes. Boston, Ginn & Co. 35 cents each.
Lewis, L. B.—“Pupil’s Notebook and Study Outline in Oriental and Greek History.” New York, American Book Co. 40 cents.
McMurray, Charles A.—“Special Method In History.” New York, the Macmillan Co.
New England History Teachers’ Association.—“Outlines for Ancient, Medieval and Modern European, English and American History,” four parts. Boston, D. C. Heath. 15 cents each.
New England History Teachers’ Association.—“Syllabus in Civil Government.” Macmillan. (Ready late in 1909.)
New Jersey Department of Public Schools.—“History Syllabus.” (In press.)
Newton, C. B., and Treat, E. B.—“Outlines for Review in History for American, English, Greek, Roman History.” New York, American Book Co. Each 25 cents.
New York, City of—“Course of Study and Syllabuses In Ethics, English History and Civics for the Elementary Schools of the City of New York.” Department of Education, New York City.
New York, Regents of the State of—“History Syllabus” (outline similar to that of the New England History Teachers’ Association, with the exception of English History).
Riley, Franklin L.—“Methods of Teaching History in Public Schools.” University of Mississippi. Published by the author. 25 cents.
Trenholme, N. M.—“Syllabus for the History of Western Europe (Medieval and Modern).” Boston, Ginn & Co. 60 cents.
Wilson.—“Compendium of United States and Contemporary History.” Boston, D. C. Heath & Co. 40 cents.
Random Syllabi and Related Resources
A Selected Bibliography And Syllabus of the History of South 1584-1876 by William K. Boyd and Robert P. Brooks. Bulletin of the University of Georgia 18.6, 1918.
Walter L. Fleming. The Reconstruction of the Seceded States, 1865-76, Home Education Syllabus
A Syllabus of North Carolina History, 1584-1876 by William K. Boyd and J. G. de Roulhac Hamilton. 1913
Syllabus of Home-County Club Studies. University of North Carolina Record 121, 1914
A Syllabus of Psychological Warfare, 1946
A Syllabus of Kentucky Folk-Songs. 1911
The Study of History in Schools; report to the American Historical Association by the Committee of Seven, Andrew C. McLaughlin, chairman, Herbert B. Adams, George L. Fox, Albert Bushnell Hart, Charles H. Haskins, Lucy M. Salmon, H. Morse Stephens. 1899
Bohan, Chara Haeussler. 2003. “Early Vanguards of Progressive Education: The Committee of Ten, the Committee of Seven, and Social Education.” Journal of Curriculum & Supervision 19, no. 1: 73.
Report of the Committee of Ten on Secondary School Studies: with the reports of the conferences arranged by the Committee. 1894